Talk:Battle of Bondo/GA1
Latest comment: 5 years ago by No Great Shaker in topic GA Review
GA Review edit
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: No Great Shaker (talk · contribs) 21:15, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
Starting review edit
Should be able to start tomorrow. No Great Shaker (talk) 21:15, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
Basic GA criteria edit
- Well written: the prose is clear and concise.
- Well written: the spelling and grammar are correct.
- Complies with the MOS guidelines for lead sections.
- Complies with the MOS guidelines for article structure and layout.
- Complies with the MOS guidelines for words to watch (e.g., "awesome" and "stunning").
- Complies with the MOS guidelines for writing about fiction. Not applicable.
- Complies with the MOS guidelines for list incorporation. Not applicable.
- Complies with the MOS guidelines for use of quotations.
- All statements are verifiable with inline citations provided.
- All inline citations are from reliable sources, etc.
- Contains a list of all references in accordance with the layout style guideline.
- No original research.
- No copyright violations or plagiarism.
- Broad in its coverage but within scope and in summary style.
- Neutral.
- Stable.
- Illustrated, if possible.
- Images are at least fair use and do not breach copyright.
Summary edit
A very interesting article that is well written and stays within scope whilst achieving summary style. I altered the introduction because, as with Battle of Bombo, there is no need to begin an article with the title. It makes for awkward construction. I've no problems with this article and am happy to pass it immediately. Well done. No Great Shaker (talk) 10:24, 25 May 2019 (UTC)