Talk:Battle of Blanco Canyon

Comments for JiM

As requested, I've looked thru the article. Not an expert copyeditor, or even a content person, so feel free to ignore advice and revert if it doesn't make sense. I'm just keeping a running list here; feel free to cross out or delete items when they're dealt with, or you decide they can be ignored.

• Some editorializing seems to have snuck in, so I tweaked phrasing in places. Revert me if I ruined the meaning.
• I was about to wikilink Blanco Canyon, but am now confused whether this canyon is on the White river or the Brazos; the article Blanco Canyon is on the White. You might want to look into a bit and see if it is the same, or different. Figured it out, although evidently there is no article on White River (Texas) yet. So do I undertand right that the White River runs thru Blanco Canyon, but that it is also near the headwaters of the Freshwater Fork of the Brazos?
• Someone better than me at references and citations should take a look at the reference formatting. I think if you give a reference a name, you only need to use that name from then on, not repeat the web adddress each time. Also, you would just use {{reflist}} in the "References" section instead of re-writing the reference names. Also, I just don't know ref formatting well, but there seem to be a couple of extraneous </cite> tags in a couple of places; do they belong? I should probably learn that someday.

That's all I have. Interesting stuff, thanks for putting it together. --barneca (talk) 16:36, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

barneca (talk) Your help was greatly appreciated! I will be posting another new article late in the week, and if you have time, I would greatly appreciate your keen editorial eye helping with that one also - you catch things I miss! JohninMaryland (talk) 15:53, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Battle of Blanco Canyon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050711082454/http://www.gbso.net/Skyhawk/comanche.htm to http://www.gbso.net/Skyhawk/comanche.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060630175749/http://www.historychannel.com/thcsearch/thc_resourcedetail.do?encyc_id=206146 to http://www.historychannel.com/thcsearch/thc_resourcedetail.do?encyc_id=206146
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080509122616/http://www2.itexas.net/~teddun/tedspage.htm to http://www2.itexas.net/~teddun/tedspage.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:29, 16 July 2017 (UTC)