Talk:Battle of Bazentin Ridge
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Keith-264 in topic "Real" Subheadings?
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of Bazentin Ridge article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
 | A fact from Battle of Bazentin Ridge appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 29 October 2004. The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
This article is featured in USA Today.--Eloquence* 12:40, Nov 5, 2004 (UTC)
Systemic bias edit
The article seems to deal exclusively with the British point of view... isn't there any German source about this battle? --Gengis Gat (talk) 18:24, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
Part of which battle of the Somme? edit
"Real" Subheadings? edit
Let's not be dogmatic when there are only a few items under a header. Keith-264 (talk) 23:49, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
- They're easier to read and easier to edit. I see no downside to them. DuncanHill (talk) 23:52, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
- Easier to read? Keith-264 (talk) 00:32, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, Larger and clearer type. DuncanHill (talk) 00:37, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
- Easier to read? Keith-264 (talk) 00:32, 11 December 2018 (UTC)