Talk:Bateau

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

image is of a bateau?

edit

From TFA: "It was traditionally pointed at both ends but came in a wide variety of sizes." Image in article is of a boat with a pointed bow and flat stern. Is the image "non-traditional" or just a "variety size". 68.50.103.5 (talk) 17:00, 14 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

What is the quote saying?

edit

I don't fully understand the quote in the lead...

"We use the spelling "batteau" because we consider that to be the correct spelling for our kind of boat - the James River Batteau, invented by the Rucker brothers in 1771"

Does that mean there is some other "kind of boat" that was not built by the Rucker brothers that is similarly named? And what is the incorrect spelling in this case? A single t? It's really not clear at all what this quote is saying.

I ask, because I've seen Wolfe's letters talking about "batteaux" during the siege of Quebec in 1759, so anything about the Rucker brothers in 1771 is either referring to a very specific version of the craft, or is just wrong.

Maury Markowitz (talk) 17:38, 21 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Other spellings

edit

The letters of Jeffery Amherst during his period as Commander in Chief of the British army in America from 1759 to 1763 make many references to batteaux, with correspondents often spelling it "battoes" or "batoes." Hattrick (talk) 21:46, 4 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Spelling

edit

Proper spelling among researchers is certainly not a problem. During most of the period when bateaux were in use, standardized spellings of names as we know them today did not exist. Phonetic spellings were used, not surprisingly for a foreign-to-English sounding word such as bateau. The section of this article regarding spelling should be removed.

Also, the image is not a bateau and at least one or maybe more of the quotes in the article do not appear to be using the term bateau in reference to the specific boat type but rather are using the French word in a poetic manner in reference to all boats. GullyWalker (talk) 12:58, 12 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Re-write needed

edit

The new lead image is of a James River Bateau which is a particular type of bateau and not representative of the bateaux which were in use elsewhere throughout North America during the 17th and 18th centuries - this is not the bateau that was in use on the St. Lawrence, Mohawk Rivers, etc., during the colonial wars or during the American Revolution. The third image is not a bateau at all. This article is badly in need of a rewrite. It should start with a description of bateaux in general followed by sections regarding the specific types, the James River Batteau, log drive bateau, etc. GullyWalker (talk) 14:54, 25 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bateau. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:51, 15 July 2017 (UTC)Reply