Talk:Batavi (military unit)

History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Roman & Byzantine / Classical

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Roman and Byzantine military history task force
	Classical warfare task force (c. 700 BC – c. 500 AD)

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Article Review by Jennifer Harreld • I think the introduction needs more, maybe a quick abstract of the details that are to come in the rest of the article • In the history section I think there should be more information about the Battle of Strasbourg, tell of its importance. • I really like the photos, especially the re-enactment one, maybe there could be a section at the end that could tell about the people who still live this history and the importance to them. • In the Batavi seniores and iuniores section, you may have some grammar corrects needed. You said, Valentinian put the shame on the batavi. I’m not sure if the shame? Is correct also you said to strip them of their arms and to sold them as runaway slaves. This too needs some grammar corrections, nothing horrible though. • I’d like to know more about the Great Conspiracy! • I love the quote! Authentic!! • My favorite thing about this article is your use of pictures, especially the maps. There are enough to broaden the ideas of the reader, like if he was using this to help spark ideas of interest he would be able to see the maps to create a nice understanding of the area. • I though the end of the article was the best. I do think the beginning needs some work, but the end of this article seemed to be written better and was very interesting. • I really like your topic and I really do think you did a fabulous job! ToothFairyJenny (talk) 06:00, 18 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

I think it might be helpful to give a brief explanation go who the Batavi people were as mentioned in the first paragraph. I know you linked to it, but it could be beneficial to have an explanation on this page as well. Also, the only other thing I really want to suggest is the use of italics when mentioning Batavi. Sometimes you italicize it and other times you don't. It gets kind of confusing and it could be a little bit difficult to differentiate whether or not you are talking about the military unit or the people. Other than that it looks good! Jen Johnson (talk) 22:43, 18 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Add topic