Talk:Basil W. Duke

Fair use rationale for File:Basil W. Duke.jpg

File:Basil W. Duke.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:15, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Pic is in public domain, as it was made in the 1800's.--Bedford 04:45, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Basil W. Duke/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Hi! I am going to be reviewing this article for GA, and should have the full review up within a few hours. Dana boomer (talk) 17:58, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   • The "References" section should come after the "Notes" section. Done
   • There should be no spaces between sequential refs. So, it should be [8][9], not [8] [9]. Done
   • There should be no new information in the lead; it should instead be a summary of all of the other sections in the article. New information and references should be moved to the body of the article in the appropriate section.

   Not sure where to place the information. I'll have to ask someone.--King Bedford I ^{Seek his grace} 03:30, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

   Perhaps try the end of the "Early life and career" section? This is where I think it would fit best. However, if other people have other ideas, that's fine too!

   • Prose issues:

   • "Early life and career" section, "save for an instance in his Reminiscences, he seldom mentioned them." Since you do not introduce this book until much later in the article, perhaps say "in his autobiography".

   Wasn't really an autobiography, more like him remembering the things he observed. Not sure how to fix this.--King Bedford I ^{Seek his grace} 03:30, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

   Hmmm...I see. I suppose it's allright as is; however, if at some point you have an epiphany for another way of wording it, please change :)

   • "Civil War service", third paragraph, "exiting his right should, barely missing his spine". Is this supposed to be "shoulder"? Done
   • Same section, fourth paragraph, is there a reason for his nickname of "The Little Whalebone"? If so, please explain.

   I saw no reason he was called this, so I removed.--King Bedford I ^{Seek his grace} 03:30, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

   • "Postbellum" section, second paragraph, "He helped to found Louisville's Filson Club Historical Society 1884,". Should this be "in 1884"? Done
   • Same section, same paragraph. For the three books that he wrote, please give publication years for all of the books, and put them in chronological order. Done
   • Same section, third paragraph, "After 1900, Duke began slowing down." This is un-encyclopedic. Perhaps replace by "After 1900, Duke began to withdraw from his public career" or something of the sort. Done
   • Same section, same paragraph, "Afterward, lived with his daughter Julia". Should this be "he lived"? Done

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   • Two of the books in the "References" section are not used in in-line referencing. Is there a reason they're needed in the refs section?

   Removed.--King Bedford I ^{Seek his grace} 03:30, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

   • All of the references need to have publisher information and ISBN numbers if available.  Done, save one did not have a ISBN, just a ASIN--King Bedford I ^{Seek his grace} 05:00, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
   • The last sentence of the "Civil War service" section needs a reference. Done

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

I am putting this article on hold for seven days in order to allow time for the issues above to be addressed. Overall, this is a well-written and well-referenced article that needs just a few minor tweaks before becoming GA. If you have questions, you can ask them here on the review page or on my talk page. Dana boomer (talk) 18:36, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. Currently, I have a job that will take most of my time thru Sunday, so I would be hard press to do anything until Monday.--King Bedford I ^{Seek his grace} 02:57, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for all your hard work so far. There's just the one concern left, which I've added a response to above. If you need more time to work on this article, that's fine and I will extend the hold for another week. Dana boomer (talk) 12:58, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Everything looks good, so I'm passing for GA. Dana boomer (talk) 14:33, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Henrietta not Tommie

Quick note about the change made in Postbellum. "Duke was devastated when, on October 20, 1909, his wife of fifty years, Tommie, died of sudden heart failure.", should have said "Duke was devastated when, on October 20, 1909, his wife of fifty years, Henrietta, died of sudden heart failure.".

From what I could find Henrietta often went by Tommy, not Tommie, which happened to be the name her oldest daughter (third child) Thomas Morgan Duke born August 18, 1863. Tommie was named after Henrietta's brother Thomas Morgan who died on July 5, 1863 at the Battle of Lebanon. Since there's no other reference to Henrietta being called Tommy in the article it would be confusing and inappropriate not to refer to her as Henrietta when speaking of her death and the impact it had on Basil. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Machivelli (talk • contribs) 21:41, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Basil W. Duke. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120502210448/http://connect1.ajaxdocumentviewer.com/viewerajax.php?1hVeAjg0J%2FlVu5QnvouK6fjcv0WV7hXWA4KN35S2HHKJAAGKam5M08CYsYXxBWPrcEzZ58eQhJfQD642oOZnyF6TWnRfdAt0a3lzE0gYx97jnvzKtbwiyWdxy1fe2iw65wF5JllkFWZYhJvJ7vczZmivxNNK9YbGtF5I9aWWyQmXap54aqB8%2FWnpHsOBYPzZC9Ntkho2RmrOSKFufAnZnYIsofoe%2FHe5sbKiePGcigmCCHX6KWzZoPh2zjx3K1xcOD27Jk5Ij2XzrhThkA6S6VxW%2F7JiXBtggMrIzH5T+8hid5buEXuL9tx25QgaccfbxfRSvAnsCnm09vJqkjxVmWcNouc6nkZ%2F5HuksFDzV5bgiAZUqftsrJVNku096lUcq8iE5f7pqSNGIVDMLz9VicrRbJjPR2jzvbg6Waul80Y= to http://connect1.ajaxdocumentviewer.com/viewerajax.php?1hVeAjg0J%2FlVu5QnvouK6fjcv0WV7hXWA4KN35S2HHKJAAGKam5M08CYsYXxBWPrcEzZ58eQhJfQD642oOZnyF6TWnRfdAt0a3lzE0gYx97jnvzKtbwiyWdxy1fe2iw65wF5JllkFWZYhJvJ7vczZmivxNNK9YbGtF5I9aWWyQmXap54aqB8%2FWnpHsOBYPzZC9Ntkho2RmrOSKFufAnZnYIsofoe%2FHe5sbKiePGcigmCCHX6KWzZoPh2zjx3K1xcOD27Jk5Ij2XzrhThkA6S6VxW%2F7JiXBtggMrIzH5T%2B8hid5buEXuL9tx25QgaccfbxfRSvAnsCnm09vJqkjxVmWcNouc6nkZ%2F5HuksFDzV5bgiAZUqftsrJVNku096lUcq8iE5f7pqSNGIVDMLz9VicrRbJjPR2jzvbg6Waul80Y%3D

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:54, 28 October 2016 (UTC)