Talk:Bashan 125R

Why is this article CONSTANTLY being deleted? For what reason? I've tried polishing the whole look, I've added references, I've added Sources, everything claimed was cited, WHAT THE HELL DO YOU WANT ME TO DO NOW C.FRED ? Deleted my newly fixed article, because I put it where a previous article deleted?? How is this not a notable product! It's being sold in South Africa by a reputable dealer by the name of Jonway, they are the leaders in Scooters and Motorcycles here in South Africa, So why do you STILL go on to delete my articles??

Exactly…because the previous article was deleted as a result of community discussion (WP:Articles for deletion/Bashan 125R), and the new version does not fix the identified flaws. If you'd like to work on the article in your user space, you can; to get it to stick in mainspace, you'll need to appeal to WP:Deletion review that the new article has corrected the flaws of the old and is not a repost. —C.Fred (talk) 15:52, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

"Non-notable product. No independent sourcing to back up any of the claims in the article. Neither the manufacturer nor the importer are notable. Finally, the creator has an apparent conflict of interest. The prod tag was removed without addressing any of the concerns, so I'm bringing it for discussion."

I've clearly noted all my sources and referenced them, I've noted the importers, and the original manufacturer, I've placed links to the bikes page on both of their products pages. I've removed phrases that could be seen as bias. I was still new to Wikipedia, and didn't know how it works, thus deleted the prod tag without addressing the issues. I'm not sure what you want me to do now, the product is an ACTUAL product, it is not entirely well known as it is still fairly new to the market, I'm trying to atleast contribute to the product and wikipedia by starting the article, I've placed it in a similar format to the Honda CBR150R, to try keep things as close as possible to something that is notable, I've tried taking tips from that page and other bike pages. Please Fred, Tell me what I'm supposed to do now, Why is this still a NON-NOTABLE product? Korn101 (talk) 20:02, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Lack of significant coverage in independent reliable sources. The one independent source is a news story talking about the city where the bikes are produced; the 125R gets only a passing mention. The other sources are either the manufacturer's or sellers' web pages. —C.Fred (talk) 23:06, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Bashan 125R. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110503054042/http://www.jonway.co.za:80/road-bikes/bashan.php to http://www.jonway.co.za/road-bikes/bashan.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:13, 10 March 2016 (UTC)