Joseph Preston Baratta

edit

Joseph Preston Baratta (talk · contribs) is the name of the author of this book: The Politics of World Federation which includes a long discusion of the Baruch Plan. — ciphergoth 16:07, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Baruch Plan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:37, 27 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Reference for last sentence.

edit

The reference for this statement "The Baruch Plan is often questioned on whether it was a legitimate effort to achieve global cooperation on nuclear control.[6]" takes me to a site that contains the same content as the Wiki page, I don't see any unique content related to this sentence. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.65.1.28 (talk) 16:32, 1 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

I've replaced it with an RS journal article. GPRamirez5 (talk) 17:35, 2 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nick Bostrom's quotation and historical significance

edit

The last sentence introduces an indirect perspective on the BP that is as relevant to it as thousand others. I propose removing it for lack of relevance to historical significance. The section may well be expanded on the merit of the BP in its own time and thereafter. Tytire (talk) 18:12, 24 October 2023 (UTC)Reply