This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
User talk:Erhoads1 has added a lot of new material of a form that is unusual (perhaps "more ambitious than usual") in Wikipedia. I believe it comes from the Driscoll book, but is uncited. I had cleaned it up a bit, and asked Erhoads to cite more completely. (Only a small amount of Driscoll is online). Then it was partially reverted. Let's please not bite the newby, his ambition compared to the usual "wooden, Burr Arch, 70 ft. long" type of bridge article is laudable. I reverted back and added some "citation needed"s. No need to rush this, no need to expect perfection on a newby's first edit! Smallbones (talk) 02:39, 14 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
