Talk:Bartnicki v. Vopper
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
editThis article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): P m c 1 2 3 4 5.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 15:20, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Cabin
editI unlinked the word "cabin." The internal link referred to nothing related to this use, Wiktionary also has no relevant definition, and to link to this definition (number 9) seems pointless. --Cory Kohn 17:51, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
Holding
editI think the holding in this case is even narrower. It was more than just that the radio station had clean hands, it was also that the conversation was a matter of public interest. Phyrkrakr (talk) A problem with this article is that it gives no background whatsoever, meaning that there is no explanation as to what the cause of the case was. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.246.84.7 (talk) 03:02, 13 June 2013 (UTC) Actually, more accurately, although not as bad as some other articles, it merely needs more detail in the background, though it does have one. Perhaps an administrator will step in and help us figure it out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.59.202.30 (talk) 05:37, 13 July 2013 (UTC)