Talk:Barthélemy d'Eyck

Question

How can a tryptych be divided between four museums? Rmhermen 16:59, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

One of the side panels has been cut into two - the figure and a "still-life" above. I think this is the left one - Isaiah, with ? the still-life in Antwerp & the figure in Rotterdam. Johnbod 17:51, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Citation changes?

This edit changes the cite style. According to WP:CITEVAR citation changes require consensus. I have this watchlisted and I've spent money on and downloaded sources for Netherlandish miniature painters - was preparing to get to this set of article shortly. I'd prefer not to work with templates. According to WP:CITEVAR editors should defer to the first major contributor. I'm assuming from the contribs that's Johnbod. Opinions? Truthkeeper (talk) 22:49, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

I've reverted your 2nd thoughts removal of this, and will revert the changes. I've come to take a hard line on cite-banditry like this; I'm now prevented from working more on other articles of mine because I'd didn't spot a change of cite style before it was too late. If whoever did it feels like whining about this, I suggest you read Talk:Ancient Roman pottery and Talk:Burford Methodist Church first. Johnbod (talk) 02:32, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks Johnbod, I was thinking about re-reverting myself. I do have sources I've downloaded on these painters and am hoping to add to some of these pages - though this is in nice shape. There's really no reason at all to change the citation style. Truthkeeper (talk) 02:36, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

Actually I can't now see when the changes were made, so where to revert to. Can you spot it? But most of the refs were originally done by me in meat & potatos style & can be retrieved from the history. Feel very free to go back to that - I have it watchlisted. Johnbod (talk) 02:41, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

It's this edit with the cite templates added and a template to format a note. Probably better for you to take care of it w/ a copy/paste or maybe it can be undone. I don't think the page has been edited since. Truthkeeper (talk) 02:45, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

Ok, done that, but other unauthorised cite templates were added earlier as well. The sf ones are especially objectionable. Johnbod (talk) 02:51, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

They are. I can look - she edited minutes after I'd edited so I noticed the most recent edit because it popped right up on my watchlist. Truthkeeper (talk) 02:56, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

That's very odd - before this edit there aren't any cite templates and then after there are but I don't see them being added in these diffs. But that's were it had to have happened. Truthkeeper (talk) 03:03, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

The one at note 2 goes back to 2009 at least. Johnbod (talk) 14:58, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Barthélemy d'Eyck. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080416103312/http://xv.kikirpa.be:80/database/MASTERS/M-Aix.htm to http://xv.kikirpa.be/database/MASTERS/M-Aix.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:05, 27 October 2016 (UTC)