Talk:Barry McKenzie

Latest comment: 5 years ago by 59.167.234.198 in topic Termination reason

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Barry McKenzie. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:05, 27 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Termination reason edit

The termination reason given in the article (unreliability) is significantly different from the account offered by Humphries and Garland in The Complete Barry McKenzie. They reproduce a memo from Ingrams, which announced the censoring of one submission, recognised that this might cause Humphries to quit, but hoped that he would continue. Humphries states in the book "Barry McKenzie finally petered out as a result of an editorial decision, ironically at a time when I had written at least six months' worth of material in advance." This rather belies the unreliability case, especially as the book contains the pre-prepared material. PDAWSON3 (talk) 23:41, 23 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

My understanding was that it was the scene where Barry blunders in on HM the Queen seated on the lavatory which finally tore it. Despite their satirical schoolboy savagery, that idea was just too much for Ingrams and his public school clique to stomach. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.167.234.198 (talk) 03:33, 21 November 2018 (UTC)Reply