Talk:Bark bread
 | A fact from Bark bread appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 March 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bark bread. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131228090215/http://www.gammelgarden.com:80/info/n%C3%B6d.htm to http://www.gammelgarden.com/info/n%C3%B6d.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:49, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bark bread. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130405094052/http://www.arkivverket.no/arkivverket/Arkivverket/Riksarkivet/Nettutstillinger/Skatter-fra-arkivet/Bit-av-barkebroed to http://arkivverket.no/arkivverket/Arkivverket/Riksarkivet/Nettutstillinger/Skatter-fra-arkivet/Bit-av-barkebroed
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:45, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
Use in the 20th century edit
I heard a personal account saying that this was an emergency food source in the south near Kristiansand during WW2 - or at the minimum was thought of as one were things to get worse, as the source was young at the time and is not entirely reliable. It's plausible that this was due to the individual destitution of the source (daughter of an unremarried widow in the 40s), so does anyone have any documentary evidence one way or another as to its use by rural populations during the war?
At a minimum I can confirm that the nutritional content of bark was a concern regarding semi-cultivated trees in the south of Norway, and that a specific type of tree (possibly an elm, from personal observation of the groves) was preferred (by at least one family). But I haven't any sources for this - will search myself once my Norwegian is better, since I can't find anything obvious in English.
Will confirm these facts shortly, and submit am addendum should any be incomplete or inaccurate. 98.109.131.143 (talk) 05:02, 1 May 2023 (UTC)