Talk:Barium ferrite
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Untitled
editI am removing the redirect from barium ferrate, as this is clearly a different compound and gets no mention in this article. --Pyrochem (talk) 07:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Structure
editFor future reference, here are two papers on the crystal structure of barium ferrite:
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Barium ferrite. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927010119/http://jpsj.ipap.jp/link?JPSJ/16/119/ to http://jpsj.ipap.jp/link?JPSJ/16/119/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140101004754/http://www.magnaworkstechnology.com:80/ceramic_magnets.shtml to http://www.magnaworkstechnology.com/ceramic_magnets.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:40, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
BaFe2O4 is not what barium ferrite usually refers to.
editBarium ferrite usually refers to barium hexaferrite, formula BaFe12O19 also written as BaO(Fe2O3)6, which is commonly used for its magnetic properties, rather then barium monoferrite, formula BaFe2O4, which as far as I can tell, seems primarily to be used as a precursor to barium hexaferrite. I'll be editing the article to reflect this. OrganoMetallurgy (talk) 15:46, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
Preparation
edit@EdChem: I think it's usually prepared by a high temperature reaction involving BaCO3/BaO and Fe2O3. OrganoMetallurgy (talk) 00:01, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
- @OrganoMetallurgy: Like I added in this edit? EdChem (talk) 00:13, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
- I think so. OrganoMetallurgy (talk) 00:20, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks... does the article statement " Thus, BaFe12O19 is related to Fe12O20, with the empirical formula Fe3O4, i.e. magnetite.[6]" make sense to you, OrganoMetallurgy? The empirical formula for Fe12O20 is Fe3O5, so the connection to magnetite is not clear to me. Magnetite is a 1:2 mix of iron(II) and iron(III) yet ferrites are iron(III) only. The ref is an entire text book, so looking up the source is unhelpful. Thoughts? EdChem (talk) 00:31, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
- EdChem, it doesn't make sense. I suspect it is the result of a combination of errors involving formulas and confusion between the different types of ferrites (some of which are related to magnetite). Also the term ferrite doesn't exclude mixed valence iron compounds. OrganoMetallurgy (talk) 01:12, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) OrganoMetallurgy, thanks. I mis-spoke, I was thinking about this ferrite, BaFe12O19 = BaO.6Fe2O3 as iron(III) only. I favour removing the magnetite sentence entirely, what do you think? EdChem (talk) 01:18, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
- Do it. OrganoMetallurgy (talk) 01:22, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
- Nevermind, I already did it. OrganoMetallurgy (talk) 02:15, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks,OrganoMetallurgy, I was looking at the article on the 310 helix. :) EdChem (talk) 02:48, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) OrganoMetallurgy, thanks. I mis-spoke, I was thinking about this ferrite, BaFe12O19 = BaO.6Fe2O3 as iron(III) only. I favour removing the magnetite sentence entirely, what do you think? EdChem (talk) 01:18, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
- EdChem, it doesn't make sense. I suspect it is the result of a combination of errors involving formulas and confusion between the different types of ferrites (some of which are related to magnetite). Also the term ferrite doesn't exclude mixed valence iron compounds. OrganoMetallurgy (talk) 01:12, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks... does the article statement " Thus, BaFe12O19 is related to Fe12O20, with the empirical formula Fe3O4, i.e. magnetite.[6]" make sense to you, OrganoMetallurgy? The empirical formula for Fe12O20 is Fe3O5, so the connection to magnetite is not clear to me. Magnetite is a 1:2 mix of iron(II) and iron(III) yet ferrites are iron(III) only. The ref is an entire text book, so looking up the source is unhelpful. Thoughts? EdChem (talk) 00:31, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
- I think so. OrganoMetallurgy (talk) 00:20, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Requested move 13 August 2017
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: not moved DrStrauss talk 20:54, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
Barium ferrite → Barium hexaferrite – Barium hexaferrite seems to be the main focus of the article and is less ambiguous. OrganoMetallurgy (talk) 16:31, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose. BaFe6O19 is called barium ferrite, regardless of whether some happen to find it an ambiguous or inconvenient name. We just dont go around inventing names, that would be OR, not to mention confusing. If several barium ferrites are known, then we either pack them into this article or rediscuss. --Smokefoot (talk) 17:02, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
- Comment Smokefoot, Barium hexaferrite isn't a name I invented, it's a name for BaFe12O19 that is used in literature. OrganoMetallurgy (talk) 17:30, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for the explanation. But the hexaferrite term is rarely used. About 1:10 by the Google search test. --Smokefoot (talk) 19:06, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
- Comment Smokefoot, Barium hexaferrite isn't a name I invented, it's a name for BaFe12O19 that is used in literature. OrganoMetallurgy (talk) 17:30, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
- No So is this article about BaFe6O19 (too much oxygen in this formula) or BaFe12O19? It seems to be the latter, and I will assume that for adding ids. Possibly barium hexaferrite should be a redirect to here. It's also called "Ferroxdure"[1]. There is a wikidata item with this hexaferrite name.[2] but maybe that should be merged with the barium ferrite data[3] linking this article. Google thinks that "Barium ferrite" is the most common, followed by "barium hexaferrite" followed by "Ferroxdure", with "barium hexaferrate" in last position. Note there is also Barium ferrate which is BaFeO4 and is clearly different. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:16, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
- Comment There is also the antiferromagnetic barium monoferrite BaFe2O4 that sometimes occasionally is confused with barium hexaferrite. Which I suspect is related to the fact that the formula on this page was incorrectly listed as being BaFe2O4 for the last ten years. OrganoMetallurgy (talk) 13:41, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose. There's no article on other forms of barium ferrite and no prospect of one, see Category:Barium compounds. This article does have issues in that the existence of other forms should be clearly mentioned, and we should have a link to and from barium ferrate for those without the chemistry to know the significance of the distinction. Andrewa (talk) 18:46, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.