Talk:Bare-shanked screech owl

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Yoninah in topic Did you know nomination

Did you know nomination edit

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 19:00, 30 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

5x expanded by SL93 (talk). Self-nominated at 23:44, 23 August 2020 (UTC).Reply

  • *Comment: DYK check says that it hasn't been 5x expanded, but it is wrong. SL93 (talk) 23:45, 23 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • Starting review--Kevmin § 20:50, 24 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
  •  Article expansion new enough and long enough at 2,735 per the character count tool. No copyvio issues identified and the single 4.8% return with earwig is to specific names rather then phrases. All paragraphs are sourced and neutral in wording. No policy violations identified in the article. Im not totally sure about the hook, do we know what sourcing Owling is utilizing for the statement of a single nest being studied?--Kevmin § 21:07, 24 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • Kevmin I found an exact source, that is also listed on the website as references that Owling uses for articles. I will add it now. SL93 (talk) 21:14, 24 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • Kevmin What do you think of the new reference? SL93 (talk) 21:15, 24 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
  •   With the extra reference supporting the hook statemen, we are now good to go.--Kevmin § 00:06, 25 August 2020 (UTC)Reply