Talk:Bardi (surname)

Did you know nomination

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that though Donatello was a Bardi, he wasn't a Bardi?
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Liverpool Women's Hospital bombing
  • Comment: Probably qualifies as a quirky hook. Yes, source in article.

Created by Kingsif (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 128 past nominations.

Kingsif (talk) 03:47, 17 July 2024 (UTC).

• I will take a look at this. simongraham (talk) 15:45, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
• This looks good. The article is new enough (written on 17 July), long enough (3,786b of prose), has no copyright violations (Turnitin and Earwig report 0% likelihood) and seems well-sourced. The hook is quirky and I feel is interesting. Is there a reference for the assertion? Coonin 2018 p. 18 states that he "was probably not closely related to the famous Bardi family". simongraham (talk) 14:41, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

• @Simongraham: We know Donatello's immediate family was not the Bardi bankers (Coonin p.17 establishes this I believe), and then Coonin p.18 says that it's not likely they were extended family, either, but distant - I suppose given the focus in that part of the article is on how intertwined the Bardi branches were or weren't, that's why I only cited p.18. But, yeah, we could add p.17 to the reference. Kingsif (talk) 23:49, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

Expanded reference in article. Kingsif (talk) 22:59, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

@Kingsif: Does the hook need the caveat "probably" as per the source? simongraham (talk) 04:28, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

@Simongraham: I don't think the hook needs it; the source establishes his immediate family was not the famous bankers, which I would feel comfortable to say confirms that "he wasn't [one]". The sentence in the article about how distant that relation is, might warrant it, though other sources speak more firmly (e.g. [1]). Kingsif (talk) 11:12, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

@Kingsif: Seems reasonable. That looks good to me. simongraham (talk) 07:23, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: simongraham (talk) 07:23, 25 July 2024 (UTC)