Talk:Baraka Al Yamaniyah
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small} | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Baraka Al Yamaniyah. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130130152901/http://www.asharq-e.com/news.asp?section=3 to http://www.asharq-e.com/news.asp?section=3&id=32774
- Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://iqballatif.newsvine.mobi/_news/2012/06/16/12255694-two-down-and-one-to-go-prince-salman-will-be-the-last-of-sudairi-seven
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:20, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
Rape Slave, not 'concubine' edit
The lady was a rape slave. She was purchased and used for rape. It matters not whether her satanic owner gave her money or 'status' later in life. She was purchased so she could be raped by a Saudi monster, and then she was raped by this Saudi monster. This resource pretends to be left leaning, and pro-Human Rights. Yet it has a clear agenda, and happily whitewashes the very worst Human Crimes when it suits the regimes in the USA and UK. 86.104.22.115 (talk) 02:15, 10 December 2023 (UTC)