Talk:Baptist Faith and Message
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Baptist Faith and Message article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
.jpg)
Untitled section edit
The statement:
"a provision which caused considerable discussion and dissent both within and outside of the convention's member churches"
under "Women's Limitations In Marriage and Ministry" should have a reference. The footnote at the end of the sentence does not support the claims of the sentence.
I don't know if I'm really qualified, but I'm gonna take the graffiti celebrating Falwell's death off this page. Some real Wikipedian can review it later, I reckon. ;)
Of course it is "qualified by Scripture"! edit
It might not be in the Baptist Faith and Message itself, but a good percent of the congregation and everyone who went through seminary (which comprises the whole staff of the convention) have read this in the Bible: 1 Tim. 2:12 [NIV]: I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man... 1 Tim. 3:2-3 [NIV]: Now the overseer must be above reproach, the husband of but one wife, temperate, self-controlled, respectable, hospitable, able to teach, not given to drunkenness, not violent but gentle, not quarrelsome, not a lover of money.
This being said, someone please change that paragraph.63.215.29.113 03:17, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
Affirmations section edit
I'm not sure just what the dickens this section is supposed to mean or say. --Orange Mike 16:48, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
I updated links [1] and [2] for links to descriptions of the 2000 BFM and the different BFMs with Scripture references. Sh33na 18:39, 4 December 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sh33na (talk • contribs)
Ratification Statistics? edit
(I suspect) there is an unwritten reason why the 1925 BFM still appears on the SBC website. It has to do with appeasing a crowd that doesn't move forward or accept change readily. There are obviously/possibly SBC member churches that never ratified the 1963 version (and I attend a church "delinquent" in adopting the latest 1998 and 2000 changes). As an encyclopedic article, this important set of statistics is missing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by MathInclined (talk • contribs) 00:15, 10 August 2010 (UTC)