Talk:Banjawarn Station

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Periwinklewrinkles in topic Request to check a source (Australia)

earlier comments edit

Greetings fellow station writer-uppers, I have a suggestion that we qualify station names with western australia in the titles, any complaints about that? with so many uk, canada and usa arts assuming centrality in the known universe, I believe we need the moniker, western australia - regardless of stubs. eagerly awaiting further comment.  :) vcxlor 08:14, 24 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

I was about to post that that probably wasn't necessary, but then I found it at WP:NAME--looks like you're right that these ought to be moved. I say go for it. =) --Dvyost 06:08, 28 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

references edit

I've had a quick look on the web to see if there are any online sources and although I have linked to two of them all references to the mystery explosion are v dubious and all seem to be written by just one guy. I think the article needs to be completely re-written to focus on events which are much better documented i.e. the experiment on sheep. Phonemonkey 21:08, 10 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Removal of contents edit

I've removed all contents that couldn't be verified by the Australian police source, as well as two of the references. In spite of the article being tagged for months, nobody managed to back up the rather unusual claims. The previous references were, as has been pointed out already, quite suspect (or in less flattering terms: a bunch of conspiracy and pseudo-scientific rants).

Robert 11:35, 20 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

The New York Times Reports about a large sysmic event at this location edit

[1]

If you look at this article, you will see that there were investigations and the conclusion is that this was a meteor, but it doesn't seem that the scientists are convinced. There is some teeth to the terrorist theory. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Linuxcpa (talkcontribs) 23:53, 14 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Seismic event, again edit

I came to this page to find about about the seismic event, having read about it in Bill Bryson’s book, only to find it’s been discarded, and I've had to rummage in the edit history to find it.
I wouldn’t describe Bryson or the New York Times as conspiracy theorists or pseudo-scientific ranters; if they’ve referred to the incident I’d say that makes it notable.
If the truth is otherwise, it’d be fairer to put a counterpoint, not to bin it altogether.
I was intrigued by the story, as Bryson was, and wanted to know more; and I ‘m sure I’m not the only one.
So I’m proposing to re-write the account and put it back, unless there are any objections.
Moonraker12 (talk) 17:23, 17 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

OK, done (finally!) Moonraker12 (talk) 14:15, 12 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Banjawarn Station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:23, 14 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Request to check a source (Australia) edit

It's about the 1 June 1993 article in the Kalgoorlie Miner. It should be available online in the National Library of Australia, but only for people with an Australian library card.

Is anyone able to access this and check if the newspaper reported on a fireball? And about the fireball moving from south to north? Periwinklewrinkles (talk) 07:19, 9 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

I do have access to the National Library online, but it appears that the only online issues are 1895-1954 (On Trove, should not require a login), or May 2020 - May 2021 (PressReader, requires NLA login). Mitch Ames (talk) 07:56, 9 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
If anyone needs this article in the future (the title is Meteor theory in earth tremor, and it's on page 3), a copy can be obtained by email from the State Library of Western Australia (from a microform copy they keep), it costs under AUD 20. Periwinklewrinkles (talk) 02:01, 14 May 2021 (UTC)Reply