Talk:Banggai crow

Birds Low‑importance

Banggai crow is part of WikiProject Birds, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative and easy-to-use ornithological resource. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Please do not substitute this template.BirdsWikipedia:WikiProject BirdsTemplate:WikiProject Birdsbird articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has had a peer review which is now archived.

WikiProject Birds To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Endemic birds of Papua New Guinea (more)
Cleanup : Bullfinch • Vesper sparrow • Bird flight • Bird bath (more)
Copyedit : Plushcap • Magpie duck • Saker falcon (more)
Expand : Phalarope • Nidicolous • Gouldian finch • Cathartes • Cnemophilidae • Avian malaria (more)
NPOV : Debeaking • Driven grouse shooting • Abu Dhabi Falcon Hospital (more)
Stubs : Cathartiformes • Semiplumbeous hawk • Rainbow-bearded Thornbill • Sunda scops owl (more)
Update : Coal tit • Scottish crossbill • New Caledonian lorikeet • Operation Migration (more)
Verify : Argus (bird) • Blyth's frogmouth • Nik Borrow • Pytilia • Fregata • Chestnut-headed tesia • Darter • Pallid scops owl • Starling (more)
Wikify : Ninox boobook ocellata • The Institute for Bird Populations (more)
Other : Add photos to bird articles needing photos (search Flickr for free images). Add taxonomic authorities to genus articles.

More outstanding tasks at the project's cleanup listing, Category:Birds articles needing attention, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds/Todo.

Extinct Bird? edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I was wondering why the [[category:extinct birds]] was added, as I thought it was disputed as to whether or not the bird still exists. Is this the norm for such species? Cheers, Corvus coronoides _talk 00:44, 29 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Clear Bias in article edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The article reads, "Fortunately this proved to be incorrect and the status was corrected to Critically Endangered in the 2007 Red List." This blatantly violates NPOV, as the author assumes the a species not going extinct is a good thing. Surcer (talk) 17:36, 13 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Add topic