Talk:Bandar Sri Damansara

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Bandar Sri Damansara. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:14, 18 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Headers and Formats Modified

edit

I have re-edited the headers and formats to follow Wiki's guidelines and have removed links which are deemed as adverts, while maintaining a proper information and insight of this township. Thanks GermanJoe for the heads-up and clarification in regards to my previous edits.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Russ L (talkcontribs)

@Russ L: Thank you for starting this talkpage discussion. The removed content has some basic flaws: first of all such content should be based on independent reliable sources (WP:RS) for verification. Ideally all content should be sourced (atleast in theory ...). Also, some of the information about local businesses, restaurants and hotels would be better suited for WikiVoyage, Wikipedia's sister project for travel-related information. Wikipedia articles should focus only on a summary of the most relevant encyclopedic details. A last point: any statement of opinion or subjective claim must be sourced to avoid original research and possibly non-neutral editing (WP:OR, WP:NPOV). Hope that helps to clarify my reasoning behind the reverts - you'll find more detailed information about the mentioned aspects in the blue-linked guidelines. GermanJoe (talk) 13:46, 12 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:37, 19 August 2018 (UTC)Reply