Whoo-boy. Somebody needs to edit this article for spelling errors, but I don't understand the subject matter enough to want to stick my nose into it. Rcarlberg (talk) 20:30, 14 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Milton Friedman section edit

Why is this section even in here? It has nothing to do with the bancor as a concept and seems like a literal copy paste from either the Friedman page, the Keynes page or one of the articles dealing with Keynesian or monetarist economics. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.192.6.10 (talk) 14:12, 24 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Half or more of the article has nothing to do with bancor as a concept. 174.46.28.58 (talk) 16:11, 22 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

neturality needs to be kept in the article edit

This article has in the past strayed away from describing the subject and into promoting it as an idea. The article should not unilaterally be making a case for bancor. It should not present subjective histories of the Bretton Woods conference. It should not present a long section that promotes only points of view in favor of bancor. 174.46.28.58 (talk) 16:08, 22 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Bancor is now the name of a company (June 2017) edit

This company named Bancor just raised US$150 million in capital. Found this article; would expect other reliable sources in tomorrow's business press. Interesting. http://www.coindesk.com/150-million-tim-draper-backed-bancor-completes-largest-ever-ico/ N2e (talk) 19:48, 12 June 2017 (UTC)Reply