Talk:Baltimore railroad strike of 1877/GA1

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Auntieruth55 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Auntieruth55 (talk · contribs) 17:18, 4 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

@Timothyjosephwood:

  • Nicely done. You are missing a foot note in the 6th Regiment section.
  • I fixed a broken sentence toward the end. see here
  • Let me know when you've added the citation in and I'll check the images and pass. auntieruth (talk) 17:18, 4 July 2017 (UTC)Reply


GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
  • @Auntieruth: I'm not sure what footnote you are referencing that is missing, and also do you mean in inline citation or a note? TimothyJosephWood 02:24, 5 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
Reping @Auntieruth55:. TimothyJosephWood 02:25, 5 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
All is good now!  :) Passed. Nicely done. auntieruth (talk) 13:49, 5 July 2017 (UTC)Reply