Talk:Balkrishna/Archive 1

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Yogesh Khandke in topic Tags
Archive 1

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Balkrishna. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:04, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

AfD nomination

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

How is this nonsense allowed? "He has explored four rare and extinct aṣṭavarga plants used as ingredients in the preparation of chyavanaprāśa, an Ayurvedic tonic. Discovered the sañjīvanībūtī of legendary fame." This article should be up for deletion. If no neutral information can be provided, none should be provided at all. Least of all claims of resurrecting extinct plants or creating magic medicines!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.91.152.105 (talk) 07:02, 24 May 2016 (UTC) Edit: Marked for deletion. As per Wikipedia's deletion policy [1], this article violates rule #4 "Advertising or other spam without any relevant or encyclopedic content", #7 "Articles for which thorough attempts to find reliable sources to verify them have failed" - Good luck finding sources for him rediscovering extinct plants, #9 "Articles that breach Wikipedia's policy on biographies of living persons", blatantly violating no original research and #14 "Any other content not suitable for an encyclopedia" which clearly states no to "Advocacy, propaganda, or recruitment of any kind: commercial, political, scientific, religious, national, sports-related, or otherwise" or "Self-promotion". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.91.152.105 (talk) 07:12, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

@219.91.152.105: Nomination has been completed, copying the above information. --Finngall talk 18:09, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Balkrishna. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot*this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:20, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Golden Book of World Records as a source

First, it doesn't appear to be a reliable source. I suggest starting at WP:RSN if you disagree. The only discussion I've found about it suggests the same: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Golden_Book_of_World_Records

Second, it's a platform for promotion, so without an independent source, I don't think it should be used. --Ronz (talk) 17:44, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Tags

I request the person who has placed various tags to discuss his rationale behind Placing them. Yogesh Khandke (talk) 01:52, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

The article still needs to be rewritten from better sources, as the AfD shows. Much of this article is still puffery. What we need are sources with in-depth coverage that are clearly independent of the subject. http://www.business-standard.com/article/companies/how-patanjali-s-balkrishna-became-wealthier-than-many-conventional-indian-tycoons-117092801206_1.html seems lacks much depth, but isn't fawning over Baba Ramdev and Balkrishna as some coverage does. --Ronz (talk) 14:41, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
Specific text and its source that is objectional please. Yogesh Khandke (talk) 02:24, 4 October 2017 (UTC)