This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belgium, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belgium on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelgiumWikipedia:WikiProject BelgiumTemplate:WikiProject BelgiumBelgium-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
This article was copy edited by Gog the Mild, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 15 August 2015.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles
Latest comment: 16 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
Was this man really called Baldwin? Or is this another example of Anglocentrisme? What is wrong with Baudoin or Boudewijn? johanthon (talk) 10:32, 23 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
I'd be willing to bet that the only contemporary version of his name we possess is Latin (prob. Balduinus, Balduuinus). The English is as close to the Latin as the French or Dutch. It is typical of most modern languages that they translate the names of historical figures. What's wrong with Baldwin? Srnec (talk) 23:10, 23 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
The man didn't spoke Latin, nor did his kin, his followers, his dependants, his peasants, or any of his neighbours. In his attested native languages he is not called Baldwin, Balduinus or Balduuinus. And in which primary sources he is called Balduinus or Balduuinus? johanthon (talk) 16:05, 24 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
He's not called Baudouin or Bodewijn in his "attested" language, either. And how do you know he didn't speak Latin? His language may be attested, but is his Germanic name attested in any contemporary primary source referring to him? He is "Balduinus" in the Annales Vedastini. Srnec (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
