Removed Non-POV tag edit

I removed the non-POV tag for two reasons. First, there was no discussion on this talk page as to why it should be there in the first place. Second, as the references show, the Baldwin-Felts Detective Agency was notorious for its use of violence against labor union supporters. Asking for a "balanced" view of the Baldwin-Felts agency's work would be similar to asking for an article on Nazi deathcamp guards to talk about the good work the Gestapo did. There may have been isolated instances in which Baldwin-Felts agents prevented violence or destruction of property. But, on the whole, the agency is best-known for its brutality and general thuggishness, and its role in the Hatfield and Matewan tragedies. - Tim1965 15:37, 14 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

I am not certain that I agree entirely. I agree that they were a brutal agency of anti-union thugs. It is also true that they did investigate thefts and murders on the railroads (though some of these incidents were as brutal as their union activities). I think that any time you study the agency you have to take into account that the principals did believe they were the white hats keeping back the deadly "isms" of unionism and communism. While my judgment on the agency is largely in line with your own there are others (see Velke's book) who would disagree. John Adkins 20:25, 8 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fayette County, WV edit

I am just trying to understand Wikipedia; consequently, I am not sure of how I can contribute at this time. I have always used different sources. I have had bad luck using this encyclopedia because it would not let me edit things I am legally responsible for. I find it to be very frustrating to be denied editing rights to a listing that provides information about something you personally own or control in life. It is sort of like "How dare you delete my edits when I am the source!"

As far as Baldwin-Felts goes, I would like this listing to include information about their involvement with Justus Collins in Fayette County, West Virginia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.118.85.100 (talk) 00:39, 19 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Neutrality of Matewan Massacre section edit

This section seems to omit facts found on the Battle of Blair Mountain article (which is referenced) that seems much more incriminating against the agency. For example that the agents illegally evicted a family and then produced a bogus warrant for an officer's arrest. Furthermore, the use of the word 'assassinate' isn't very neutral, as they killed two men in cold blood. I'd recommend expansion of this section to include further facts and greater neutrality. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adam Kightley (talkcontribs) 19:06, 1 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Baldwin–Felts Detective Agency. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:40, 2 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Ludlow Massacre section misrepresents the nature of the horrific event. edit

The Ludlow Massacre section misrepresents the nature of the horrific event. It was not a confrontation between miners and strike breakers. The miners were away at a strike. The Baldwin-Felts men, backed by the Colorado National Guard. confronted and slaughtered women, children, and infants in their camp tents while the miners were away. Children were machine-gunned and burned alive. Characterizing the Ludlow Massacre as a contest between adults of differing views is simply wrong.

Howard Zinn describing Ludlow Massacre The American Experience, PBS: The Ludlow Massacre --Bilipede (talk) 11:48, 28 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Agreed. Devgirl (talk) 22:56, 9 April 2020 (UTC)Reply