Talk:Balanced trade
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 16 April 2008. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
Is this really significant
editI havnt heard of many economists arguing this. Most understand that this is an impossibility as one country will be exporting and another will be importing. (Gibby 11:43, 5 March 2006 (UTC))
- I say delete it! (Gibby 11:44, 5 March 2006 (UTC))
Impossible?
edit"Most understand that this is an impossiblity..." Where does this "most" come from?
Why is this article focused on just "...the surplus nation..." Why cannot a deficit nation take action? Why isn't the word tariff used?
This is not the best link but here is what one congressional condidate thinks the term balanced trade means. http://www.jackdavis.org/new/speeches/balanced.asp
Tagged for deletion
editI've tagged this article for deletion, as it seems to be totally unimportrat. I've never heard a relivant reference to it and the article is uncited. Larklight (talk) 13:13, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
Object to Deletion
editThis concept is related to dealing the "new normal" unemployment situation. Should be explored and expanded.Polecon (talk) 09:42, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
nnpov & desperately incomplete
editNPOV|VERY one-sided; unbalanced, reads like an "advocacy"-piece AND totally lacking in the basic content required of any serious article about economics-theory
as an economics & trade article, it's a glorified, wordy "stub"