Talk:Bacterial morphological plasticity

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bacterial morphological plasticity article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 5 May 2012 by reviewer Joey Roe (talk · contribs).

Microbiology B‑class High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microbiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microbiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrobiologyWikipedia:WikiProject MicrobiologyTemplate:WikiProject MicrobiologyMicrobiology articles
B	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Consistency

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The lead twice uses the word "consistency". It is not clear in what sense this word is being used. Is it like the "consistency of a pudding"? Or does it refer to uniformity across individuals? Either sense seems equally plausible to me. Maproom (talk) 08:42, 10 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

I believe it meant homeostasis or "constancy" within the bacterial cell. It doesn't matter now since whoever wrote the lead seemed to misread the reference. I rewrote the lead to reflect what the reference says: [1]. CatPath (talk) 22:57, 11 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic