Talk:Back to Tennessee (song)

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Good articleBack to Tennessee (song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starBack to Tennessee (song) is part of the Hannah Montana: The Movie soundtrack series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 26, 2010Good article nomineeListed
April 13, 2010Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:Back to Tennessee (song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Hey there, I'll be reviewing this article for potential GA listing. I've noticed a couple of things that could be improved, but overall it seems like it's coming on nicely.

Thanks for reviewing! I suppose this hasn't shown up on the nominator's watchlist, but I took a look at it and hopefully satisfied your concerns. Liquidlucktalk 02:22, 16 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
  1. A citation needs to be added in the introduction after "The song well received by contemporary critics", not to mention there is a grammatical error in that very sentence. Later in that sentence it also goes onto describe the chart success, this also requires a citation.
I gave the article a complete copy-edit and hopefully fixed everything. I believe the article complies with WP:LEAD in that it the lead doesn't need citations because all facts mentioned in the lead are mentioned again and cited later on in the article. The facts you mentioned are cited in #Critical reception and #Chart performance. Liquidlucktalk 02:22, 16 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
  1. Any chance of getting the cover art in the article too?
I wasn't able to find the cover art anywhere. Most reviews use the cover of the album by the same name, but I don't know if that's the "official" cover (there was a sentence in the article that said it was, but I wasn't able to verify it and deleted it). Liquidlucktalk 02:22, 16 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
  1. My only other qualm is that in the 'Music Video' section, I feel that too much detail is gone into there. Perhaps just a link to the video would suffice, as opposed to commentating on the sequence of events in said video (particularly the description of what he is wearing).
I cut down the description and took out the clothing descriptions from both it and the live performances section. Liquidlucktalk 02:22, 16 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

As for the rest though, particularly the references, it all looks great. Nice work, I'll be checking back over the next week or two to see how things improve.

Thanks for the review, and for keeping the review open until someone could fix your concerns! Liquidlucktalk 02:22, 16 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: TheStig 20:43, 27 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

The article looks fantastic. One thing, if you remove the italicization of the online sources, this is ready to go to GA-world. Let me know once done. --Legolas (talk2me) 06:28, 23 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
  Done. Thanks for finishing up the review! liquidlucktalk 22:15, 25 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

GA

edit

How are thing coming along with the review? It seems to have been on review for quite a while. Are the issues being fixed? I'll e happy to assist or provide a second opinion if anybody wants it. Best of luck with it, anyway. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:46, 11 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Back to Tennessee (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:19, 19 April 2017 (UTC)Reply