Talk:Back 2 You / Still Grey

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Assessment comment edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Back 2 You / Still Grey/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)Press [show] to view →
Start class:
  •  Y A reasonably complete infobox
  •  Y A lead section giving an overview of the single
  •  Y A track listing
  •  Y Reference to at least primary personnel by name (must specify performers on the current single; a band navbox is insufficient)
  •  Y Categorisation at least by artist and year

C-class:

  •  Y All the start class criteria
  •  Y A reasonably complete infobox, including cover art
  •  Y At least one section of prose (in addition to the lead section)
  •  Y A track listing containing track lengths and authors for all songs
  •  Y A "personnel" section listing performers, including guest musicians
  •  Y Reliable independent in-line references supporting claims
  •  Y A casual reader should learn something about the song/single

B-class:

  •  Y All the C-class criteria
  •  Y A completed infobox, including cover art and most technical details
  •  Y A full list of personnel, including technical personnel and guest musicians
  •  Y No obvious issues with sourcing, including the use of blatantly improper sources
    – Although an online reference would be preferable for listing personnel
  •  N No significant issues exist to hamper readability, although it may not rigorously follow WP:MOS
    – Lead section needs some expansion to adequately summarise all aspects of the article
  •  Y No obvious omissions, but also no obvious extraneous information – such as "trivia"
    – However, information on charting (the single did not chart?), song structure, and performance could be added if available
Evaluation based on WikiProject Albums assessment scale. Please update this list when the article meets (or fails to meet) any of the above criteria, changing the article's class assessment as appropriate. Last reviewed by – Ikara talk → 00:22, 4 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 00:22, 4 October 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 04:51, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Back 2 You / Still Grey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:50, 23 October 2016 (UTC)Reply