Talk:Babe: Pig in the City

Rating discussion

Babe: Pig in the City has two film ratings at once.

• In theatres: PG
• On video: G

I can't find any evidence online that the released theatrical version was rated PG by the MPAA. Can you please cite your source? Tegoweth 23:33, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

Well, the only website you CAN find any evidence that the released theatrical version was rated PG by the MPAA is at MovieGoods, where there's a poster for the released theatrical version that has a "PG" logo on it. See MovieGoods, then view the poster.

I believe the film was originally rated PG, but Universal edited it to get a G. So that poster was probably produced before the re-edit and re-submitting to the MPAA. I still don't think the PG version was released theatrically. tregoweth 17:46, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

The film was released with a G rating theatrically, and then given a PG rating for video. Not the other way around.

No! You're WRONG! The film was released with a PG rating theatrically, and then given a G rating for video. That's what it said on the TV spot for the theatrical version.

And besides, the poster for the released theatrical version that has a "PG" logo on was produced as the film's FINAL theatrical poster and the poster for the video version that has a "G" logo on was produced as the film's video poster. [1] Dont EVER lie about that film's ratings or what version had which rating again! If you still have TV spots for the theatrical version on a blank tape, see them and those TV spots for the theatrical version end with a PG rating. I've seen Antz on VHS and there was a video trailer for Babe: Pig in the City. The video trailer ends with a G rating, not PG. If you have Antz on VHS, see the video trailer for Babe: Pig in the City. Also, when Unversal never released another feature-length animated film to theaters until Curious George in 2006, no other theatrically-released film by Universal was rated G by the MPAA unitl 2006's Curious George.69.216.115.20 (talk 17:40, February 5, 2007 (UTC)

Um, no. The IMDb and filmratings.com both list this as a G rated film.tregoweth (talk) 05:33, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

You're right, it WAS rated G at the movie theaters and on home video. As for the theatrical poster showing the PG rating box, it WAS produced before it was re-rated G. It was all because the dog violence was cut except for the shot where the bull terrier pushes Babe down into the river.

Banned?

I can't believe that this film was banned in North America. It seems strange all together, banned in the US and Canada? I will delete it. If anyone can find a good source, then I'm sorry. Soetermans 18:49, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

 This film was banned?My local library owns it. How can that be?CM7Y

Money Earned

I took the information on money earned directly from the Wikipeida article on box office bombs. Please DO NOT undo my edit unless you also change the figures on the box office bombs article 63.26.213.82 (talk) 03:47, 18 October 2008 (UTC)norm

There's no nudity in the final scene

Sorry, my brother is being a pervert. He's agreed to stop, Sorry for the inconvienience.class="autosigned">—Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.52.177.124 (talk) 23:22, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

How about someone with an account get rid of the bizarre assertion that there's nudity in the final scene? It's a giant inflatable pink suit under her clothes.

Since this topic is, for some incomprehensible reason, semi-protected, I can't edit it without finally creating a Wikipedia account. I don't want to create a Wikipedia account. I've edited anonymously for years just fine, thank you. I mean really, we're talking about "Babe, Pig in the City" here folks. If this needs protection, then Wikipedia has failed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.171.18.145 (talk) 20:08, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Babe: Pig in the City. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.geocities.com/Hollywood/Theater/6696/se981128.htm
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.geocities.com/Hollywood/Theater/6696/se990102.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140922170431/https://soundcloud.com/bullseye-with-jesse-thorn/outshot-babe to https://soundcloud.com/bullseye-with-jesse-thorn/outshot-babe

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:55, 23 October 2016 (UTC)