Talk:BP/GA1
< Talk:BP
Latest comment: 17 years ago by Esoltas in topic Failed "good article" nomination
Failed "good article" nomination edit
This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of September 7, 2006, compares against the six good article criteria:
- 1. Well written?: Yes.
- 2. Factually accurate?: Not very, in respect to citations.
- 3. Broad in coverage?: Very.
- 4. Neutral point of view?: Somewhat, but it did skirt around the Prudhoe Bay section.
- 5. Article stability? Very.
- 6. Images?: Excellent.
When these issues are addressed, the article can be resubmitted for consideration. Thanks for your work so far.
My one problem is this. You have not enough references. Fix this, and nominate it again, then it will definitely pass. --Evan 10:59, 7 September 2006 (UTC)