Talk:BC Oostende

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Move request edit

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was page moved.  Skomorokh  07:13, 27 December 2009 (UTC)Reply


Base OostendeBasketball Club Oostende — Base Oostende is just the sponsor name, the club's official name is, as the article and the website state, Basketball Club Oostende or short BC Oostende. The sponsor's name is only used in the article's name if it is part of the club's name, for example Telekom Baskets Bonn or Brose Baskets, but that's not the case here. The same applies to Euphony Bree (officially Bree BBC), while Union Mons-Hainaut seems to have officially adopted the name Dexia Mons-Hainaut (not 100% sure, though). Anyway, I don't see a reason why sponsor names which aren't part of the club's official names should be part of the articles' names of Belgian clubs, while we consequently use official names in all other cases (for example, Victoria Libertas Pesaro's sponsor name Scavolini Pesaro hasn't changed since 1975, and the club is much better known by its sponsor name, but we correctly use the official name nevertheless). --Axolotl Nr.733 (talk) 11:09, 6 December 2009 (UTC) Oh, I forgot: The associated category's name still refers to the club's former sponsor name. So if we kept the sponsor name as the article's and the category's name, we would have to move the category everytime the club's sponsor name changed. I have already requested a move of the category, but is was declined. --Axolotl Nr.733 (talk) 11:21, 6 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move edit

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved per request. Neither misformation of request nor lack of rationale is any kind of objection. The presumption is always in favor of moving without question unless there is a substantive opposition. This is what we call an uncontroversial move. - GTBacchus(talk) 00:37, 27 September 2011 (UTC)Reply



Basketball Club OostendeBC Oostende — 13:10, 18 September 2011 (UTC).

  • Comment: badly formed request by User:Pick and roll [1] who has been here a year and is no newbie [2], no valid rationale - in fact none whatsoever, previous RM seems to have considered and rejected the shorter name see above, I'm tempted just to close this one rather than waste any more time on it. Andrewa (talk) 09:48, 26 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on B.C. Oostende. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:35, 11 January 2018 (UTC)Reply