Talk:B.C. Camplight

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Requested move 28 April 2014 edit

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Consensus to retain the current title. -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 16:16, 8 May 2014 (UTC)Reply



B.C. CamplightBC Camplight – Brian Christinzio now refers to himself as BC Camplight, without the full stops, as seen on his facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/BCCamplightMusic LauraRoseHowarth (talk) 22:07, 28 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Survey edit

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
  • Comment Facebook is by definition self-published and not a WP:RS. Plus we don't usually give much weight to such stylizations. Do you have any reliable printed sources to support this move? In ictu oculi (talk) 00:54, 29 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
More to the point do we have any sources to support Wikipedia:Notability (music) for this bio? An All-music review is not enough to keep a bio on someone. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:56, 29 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
Christinizio has two albums on One Little Indian, which passes WP:MUSIC. Allmusic does corroborate this and so would be enough to keep the bio. I'll note that B.C. Camplight is the stylization used on both of his releases. Chubbles (talk) 02:29, 29 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
Common mistake, IIO. WP:SELFPUB doesn't mean unreliable, simply that it must be used with caution. Self-published sources are explicitly allowed for information about the subject themselves, under certain criteria which all seem to be met here. --BDD (talk) 17:29, 29 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
  • Strongly Oppose If there are any reliable sources saying he legally changed the stylization, then perhaps we may reconsider. However, since you only provided Facebook, then it should stay. It's about equivalent to say, Brad Pitt telling his friends that he calls himself Fred Farkleson. Unless he legally changes his name, then the article shouldn't be moved, at least imo. Twyfan714 (talk) 00:28, 30 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose – per MOS:TM even if he has officially changed his trademark. Dicklyon (talk) 04:32, 2 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
    • Actually MOS:TM would seem to favor the move: it states, "Using all caps is preferred if the letters are pronounced individually, even if they don't stand for anything. For instance, use SAT for the (U.S.) standardized test or KFC for the fast food restaurant.". The "BC" is not clearly derived from a name (it might be initializing Brian Christinizio, but I don't have a source corroborating that. It could just stand for nothing.). Chubbles (talk) 15:59, 2 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
      • The topline instruction is "editors should choose among styles already in use by sources (not invent new ones) and choose the style that most closely resembles standard English, regardless of the preference of the trademark owner." Dicklyon (talk) 21:28, 2 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
        • Sources indicate both styles are in current use. I am agnostic as to whether BC or B.C. "more closely resembles standard English", but it is certainly not obviously one or the other. Chubbles (talk) 23:34, 2 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Discussion edit

Any additional comments:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Recent removals edit

I'd like to open up a discussion with the anonymous editor who keeps removing cited information from this page. As I've noted in edit summaries and on my talk page, the information you're removing is directly confirmed by the sources provided; Christinizio was open in interviews about drug addiction, alcohol abuse, and depression. They were focal points of the interviews cited. Christinizio cannot libel himself, as you have asserted on my talk page, and I cannot imagine how this being on Wikipedia would have affected his Visa status, since the information is already out there reported by major news websites (and I have no idea how you would know his Visa was still being denied, anyway). This content meets our criteria of WP:V and WP:RS, and is not subject to redaction as a result of WP:BLP, since it is reported in reliable media. Please let me know if there is any further explanation I need to give for why I have reverted your edits, or if there is any further evidence you have which would challenge my argument. Thank you. Chubbles (talk) 21:17, 24 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on B.C. Camplight. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:14, 23 October 2016 (UTC)Reply