How old were they? edit

The article makes a point of them being the youngest girl group to top the charts, but neglects to give their ages at the time (or at any time, for that matter). Clearly, if it was remarkable enough to mention this, their ages should be mentioned as well. Pimlottc 09:11, 21 March 2006

Did you check the articles on each of the members of the group? Marmaladekitty 19:56, 2 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
What does "youngest girl group" mean anyway? ISTM it could be defined in terms of
  • age of the youngest member
  • age of the oldest member
  • mean of their ages
  • sum of their ages
  • how recently the group was formed
  • ....
-- Smjg (talk) 10:47, 16 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Discography Overhall edit

I completely revamped the lacking Discography. Hope it looks okay. I borrowed the theme from S Club's discography. Hope that's okay. =] Mikay 12:58, 28 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Disputes over their DsOB edit

The official B*Witched website in its day gave their dates of birth as:

I knew about Sinead actually being five years older. But apparently it's since come out that none of those dates are right. IMDb now states that Lindsay was born 18 December 1978. Lindsay's website states that she was born in 1977, but doesn't (as far as I've found) comment on the date of the year. And IMDb still gives 1979 for both Edele and Keavy - but their articles here have been changed to state that they were born 15 December 1978, and no reference has been given. Can anybody supply one? -- Smjg 22:45, 16 June 2007 (UTC)Reply


I'd like to know why Wikipedia has Keavy's birth year listed as 1978 and Adele's birth year listed as 1979. That makes absolutely no sense for identical twins. Which is the correct birth year? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.187.150.30 (talk) 21:16, 7 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Cleanup needed edit

This article is in serious need of a copy edit -- no references, lots of contradictions and repetitions, and lack of useful structure. Will try for a first pass this evening. Gusworld (talk) 06:28, 22 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

OK, I've made a first pass at it -- eliminated the duplication and POV stuff, changed the structure to remove the biographies (which messed up the article structure), bought together the material about the reformed Lynch-only lineup, and had a stab at writing a more comprehensive and neutral lead. This was a good faith edit so I'm assuming the supplied facts are correct; the article still needs better references, especially for some of the solo activity. Gusworld (talk) 02:30, 26 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Confusing statements edit

"B*Witched are the first band to have a number one in 26 separate countries apart from the Spice Girls who got to number one with Wannabe in 30 countries" - does this mean they were the first band but their record was later bettered by the Spice Girls? It's unclear, plus it could do with a reference. Jammycaketin (talk) 18:49, 6 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

re-write edit

This article needs to be completly re-written and the Ms Lynch and Barbarellas information needs to be moved into a new article. There is also no reference for the apparent confirmed 3rd album tracks. Where did this information come from? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.208.250.226 (talk) 06:04, 22 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Twitter edit

I've removed the links to each individual member's Twitter feeds - it's not a fan site. Smurfmeister (talk) 00:40, 1 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Requested move edit

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved.ΛΧΣ21 03:04, 10 March 2013 (UTC)Reply


MOS:TM avoid Macy*s, we should not be using playful typography replacing standard characters 65.92.180.137 (talk) 22:33, 3 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

  • Comment Is there really a need to move the redirect Hold On (B*Witched song)? Armbrust The Homunculus 22:37, 3 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
    • The redirect contains the edit history of an article on the song, so should be properly situated, should it be revived as an article. -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 22:43, 3 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • Is there a reason why it should be a hyphen? What about "BeWitched" or "BWitched" or "B'Witched"? Just askin'.--StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 08:15, 6 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
    • hypenation is the normal method to attach a letter to a word, like "x-ray". But a space would also work "B Witched". -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 02:35, 7 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • Comment - not sure that a hyphen is any less playful, and is more incorrect. "girl group Bewitched" gets only 3 book hits, but then "girl group B*Witched" only gets 5. Just saying. In ictu oculi (talk) 11:54, 6 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • Comment I had the same thought as Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars, and I also agree with In ictu oculi that the hyphen may be no less playful. I think B'Witched is more likely (but is that still considered playful?), though I can see references to them being called "Bewitched", "B'Witched", "B Witched" and "B-Witched" in a Google Books search (I found well over 1000 book results). Though it's mostly "B*Witched" since that's their actual name. –anemoneprojectors– 17:14, 6 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • Support per MOS:TM, though I suppose B'Witched might be even better. Powers T 20:06, 8 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose. All fourteen of B*Witched's official releases refer to them as "B*Witched" and so does their official 2013 logo. B*Witched is the name they are most commonly associated with.--Launchballer 20:55, 8 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose - All sources have the star. Singles, albums, press releases and TV appearances. Unreal7 (talk) 21:03, 9 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on B*Witched. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:48, 23 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (January 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on B*Witched. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:16, 21 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

First girl group with debut single at Number One edit

There was a Top of the Pops of girl groups on BBC Two on September 2 2023, which said that B*Witched for the first girl group to have their debut single reach Number One in the U.K. singles chart. If this information is accurate, it ought to be mentioned in the article. YTKJ (talk) 18:54, 3 September 2023 (UTC) This may have been an error on the programme. Wannabe by the Spice Girls got to Numnber One in 1996, but C'est La Vie reached Number One in 1998. YTKJ (talk) 20:46, 3 September 2023 (UTC)Reply