Talk:Bạch Hổ oil field

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

I doubt it edit

"According to the abiogenic theory of petroleum origin, natural petroleum has no connection with biological matter[7] because the Second Law of Thermodynamics prevents that from ever happening.[8] ". This is bullshit. If you check the link (which look like a scientific papaer, but was not published in a peer reviewed science journal), you see the have proven that sugar can not be converted into petroleum, it would break the 2nd law of thermod. Fine. But plants are not 100% sugar !! In fact, when plants die, sugar disappear quickly, it's mainly lipids that sediments. So nobody ever said that petroleum comes from sugar, petroleum come from lipids. --Raminagrobis fr (talk) 06:08, 23 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Lipids cannot survive 10 kilometers deep in the mantle at pressures above 30 kilobar. No biological molecule can.Wikkidd (talk) 00:45, 4 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Exactly. Several km deep, lipids don't survive the heat and pressure, they're destroyed. Pyrolyzed. The result of this this destruction, if the conditions are adequate, is petroleum. --Raminagrobis fr (talk) 09:20, 4 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons require pressures of 30 kilobar for their formation which corresponds to 100 kilometers deep in the Earth's mantle. No biological molecule can survive 100 kilometers deep because it is past the critical temperature of water.Wikkidd (talk) 20:30, 6 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Polycyclic hydrocarbons in oil comes from... polycyclic hydrocarbons in living matter (the most famous one : Chlorophyll, nice polyciclic structure). What are you trying to demonstrate exactly? Reinventing oil geology ? --Raminagrobis fr (talk) 16:51, 7 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

I reverted Wikkidd's edits, see the discussions at Talk:Petroleum#Abiogenic Petroleum Origin and Talk:Diamondoid where Wikkidd is pushing the same fringe theories, against consensus after discussion. -Colfer2 (talk) 05:45, 4 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bạch Hổ oil field. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:40, 11 November 2016 (UTC)Reply