 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
|
|
Requested move edit
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was no consensus to support move. Also, no evidence presented. JPG-GR (talk) 06:27, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
Bălţi Steppe → Bălţi steppe — Small "s" seems to be the standard for other simmilar WP articles. — Dc76\talk 00:24, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
Survey edit
- Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with
*'''Support'''or*'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
- Support as nom.
- HOWEVER, in reaching your oppinion, please consider looking into both pages' history, also here and here. Dc76\talk 00:25, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
- A few examples: Budjak steppe, or in the article Eurasian Steppe, there is a whole list, and all names are with small s. Dc76\talk 22:45, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
- HOWEVER, in reaching your oppinion, please consider looking into both pages' history, also here and here. Dc76\talk 00:25, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose. Most Wikipedia articles capitalize the full name. See Eurasian Steppe, Pontic Steppe, Kalmyk Steppe, Kazakh Steppe etcXasha (talk) 12:32, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
- Just a small observation: Pontic Steppe redirects to Pontic-Caspian steppe, which is with SMALL s. This move request is all about consistency, and about nothing else. So, if you think that the examples presented by Xasha are what is the standard, please oppose. If you think that the standard is to use small s, please support. Dc76\talk 22:45, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
Discussion edit
- Any additional comments:
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Recent copyedit edit
If there are rational objections to any of my changes in the article, I will conceed. Dc76\talk 18:40, 11 December 2008 (UTC)