Talk:Béla II of Hungary

Latest comment: 10 years ago by Borsoka in topic GA Review
Good articleBéla II of Hungary has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 17, 2014Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 30, 2014.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that an account in the Illuminated Chronicle holds that King Coloman of Hungary (pictured) ordered the castration of his nephew, the future Béla II, but the soldier assigned the task brought him dog testicles instead?
On this day...Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on February 13, 2022, and February 13, 2023.

Álmos' exile

edit

If it would have happened in 1127, Stephen II should have been demand the extradition of Álmos from the emperor, compromise and make peace with the northern and western neighbors (Venice, Bohemia, Austria, Rus) and attack the Byzantine Empire within few months. Furthermore Álmos died in September 1127. I find this rapidity is inconceivable due to the contemporary transport, diplomacy etc. --Norden1990 (talk) 15:59, 12 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:Béla II of Hungary/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: 3family6 (talk · contribs) 01:19, 14 June 2014 (UTC)Reply


  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    Article contains a [which?] tag in "Early years until 1131"
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    The following images are tagged as needing a US public domain tag: [1], [2], [3]
    I fixed the tagging issues myself.
  7. Overall: Other than these few minor image issues and the [which?] tag, the article is good to go.--¿3family6 contribs 00:59, 14 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
Issue addressed, it is good to go! Nice job, Borsoka!
3family6, I found and added the relevant information. Thank you for your patience. Borsoka (talk) 12:19, 17 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
  1. Pass/Fail: