Talk:Båtsfjord Airport (1973–1999)

Båtsfjord Airport (1973–1999) was nominated as a Engineering and technology good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (May 2, 2013). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Aviation: Airports

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the airport project.

Norway

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles

Arctic Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arctic, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Arctic on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArcticWikipedia:WikiProject ArcticTemplate:WikiProject ArcticArctic articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago5 comments1 person in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Båtsfjord Airport (1973–1999)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Khazar2 (talk · contribs) 21:08, 24 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Arsenikk, I'll be glad to take this review. It looks like you might not be active again yet, but as last time, I'll see if it can pass without further action and then give you at least a week to answer any remaining concerns. Thanks as always for your contributions! -- Khazar2 (talk) 21:08, 24 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

"but had to keep one Twin Otter in operation past 1995 because it could not land on the gravel runway at Båtsfjord" -- why would they keep a plane in operation that couldn't land on the runway? Or is the "it" here referring to the Dash 8?
"To allow for Dash 8 services, a new airport was built further up in the valley" -- you might rephrase this as "a new airport of the same name" for clarity.
A company should be referred to as "it" rather than "they" in formal writing. -- "Using seaplanes, it flew both air taxi and air ambulance services to Kirkenes, starting in the 1960s" -- Khazar2 (talk) 11:48, 25 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Since I'm not sure if you're active, I'll leave it at this for now, but will be glad to continue when you're back. Cheers, -- Khazar2 (talk) 11:48, 25 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Closing review due to inactivity. -- Khazar2 (talk) 11:59, 2 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Add topic