Talk:Azzun Atma

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Huldra in topic 1596 data


edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Azzun Atma. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:57, 23 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

1596 data

edit

HA#p.135 clearly marks this place, (152/169), as the place noted in the 1596 defter, in Nahiya Jabal Qubal. But is HA correct?

Note that the 1596 data just calls the place for 'Azzun.

From the other history, it seems as if Azzun (155/175) is a possible choice. Alas, Azzun is located straight between P29 and P30 in Nahiya Bani Sa’b; that is Kafr Laqif and Islah, Qalqilya. Still, that is straight on the border between the two Nahiyas. Does archeological data from Azzun rule it out? I dont know. Until it does: lets keep our minds open, Huldra (talk) 23:27, 14 January 2018 (UTC)Reply