Talk:Azoospermia/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: 97198 (talk · contribs) 14:33, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Unfortunately, I am failing this GA nomination since the article still needs significant work to meet the GA criteria.

• The lead section is only three sentences and doesn't summarise the whole article (see WP:LEAD)
• There is a lack of referencing, including several {{citation needed}} tags
• Not all references comply with WP:MEDRS, which favours secondary sources over original (primary) studies and recommends citing reviews from the past five years to ensure information is up-to-date
• The treatment section is vague and lacking in citations. Ideally it should include specific treatments and especially a clear explanation of TESE since this is the mainstay of treatment for posttesticular azoospermia
• Medical articles should be accessible to a general audience, so jargon should be avoided or explained (see MOS:MED for tips)

Please feel free to renominate the article once these problems have been addressed. 97198 (talk) 14:33, 13 May 2017 (UTC)