Talk:Axis control of the Danube

Latest comment: 7 months ago by Jerium in topic Requested move 6 October 2023

Requested move 6 October 2023 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Page moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jerium (talk) 18:50, 13 October 2023 (UTC)Reply


Nazi rule over the Danube RiverAxis control of the Danube – Not sure we even need this article, but it should be renamed, Nazis never controlled the whole river, the closest they got was after they occupied Hungary, but they never had direct control of the Romanian and Bulgarian sections of the river. Also, "rule over" sounds quite pejorative, Germany had sections on the river on its internationally recognized territory and so did Axis members Bulgaria, Hungary and Romania, before I edited this article the infobox mentioned this as a "military occupation" [1] which is not completely true, furthermore more countries than Nazi Germany are included in the infobox. Super Dromaeosaurus (talk) 17:58, 6 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Agree this needs to be moved. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 20:22, 6 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Support per nomination and per comment by Peacemaker67. The proposed main title header is indeed much more intuitive. —Roman Spinner (talkcontribs) 07:26, 8 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Support. "Nazi rule" is too strong, but I think the article is a valid topic. Srnec (talk) 15:29, 9 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Support: "Nazi rule" assumes unsourced language; "Axis control" better reflects the multilateral reality. XxTechnicianxX (talk) 04:50, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Support per nom. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:16, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Support "Axis/Allied Powers" are better term "control" is more encyclopedic OrionNimrod (talk) 15:47, 12 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.