Talk:Avro Lancaster PA474
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Avro Lancaster PA474 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Article title edit
As per Wikipedia:Naming conventions shouldn't this be moved to Avro Lancaster PA474? - Ahunt (talk) 12:07, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
- Yes you are right. MilborneOne (talk) 12:23, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
What model ? Mk I or III ? edit
We need construction details. Rcbutcher (talk) 09:50, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
- In turn a Mark I, a Mark VII FE, and Mark I PR Surviving Lancaster: PA474 GraemeLeggett (talk) 11:39, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Avro Lancaster PA474. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.raf.mod.uk/bbmf/theaircraft/lancasterpa474.cfm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:04, 26 April 2016 (UTC)