Talk:Avicephala

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Creating an entire Wikipedia article for this clade may have been premature. Only 1 phylogenetic analysis has upheld this clade [1], while other more global data sets of stem-diapsid/diapsid reptiles have not recovered it, finding Coelurosauravus to be a basal neodiapsid, and drepanosaurids to be the sister group to kuhneosaurs, with both clades either being non-saurians or basal lepidosauromorphs [2][3]. Drepanosaurids have also been reported as being primitive archosauromorphs [4] This analysis used an only slightly modified version of Senter's data set and finds drepanosaurids as being archosauriform sister taxa, more derived than "prolacertiform"-grade archosauromorphs. Taxonomic sampling issues are probably at play in all three possibilities, but work by Müller offers the largest global solutions for addressing this problem.

76.26.84.35 (talk) 16:43, 27 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

References edit

  1. ^ Senter, PS (2004): http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1477201904001427
  2. ^ Müller, J. (2004): The relationships among diapsid reptiles and the influence of taxon selection. – in: Arratia, G., Cloutier, R., & Wilson, V. H. (eds.): Recent Advances in the Origin and Early Radiation of Vertebrates: 379-408, München (Dr. Friedrich Pfeil).
  3. ^ Bickelmann, C. et al. (2009): http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/nrc/cjes/2009/00000046/00000009/art00002
  4. ^ Renesto S. & Binelli G. (2006) “’’Vallesaurus Cenensis’’ Wild, 1991, A Drepanosaurid (Reptilia, Diapsida): From the Late Triassic of Northern Italy”, Riv. It. Paleont. Strat. 112: 77-94, Milano.

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Avicephala. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:54, 22 October 2016 (UTC)Reply