Talk:Available name

Animals Mid‑importance

Available name is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to animals and zoology. For more information, visit the project page.AnimalsWikipedia:WikiProject AnimalsTemplate:WikiProject Animalsanimal articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Animals To-do:

Here are some Open Tasks :

Copyedit:
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Improve: Photoperiodism, Tool use by non-human animals, Omnivore, Animal suicide, Sphaerium beckmani (a species in family Sphaeriidae),
Requests:
- Mammals:
- Invertebrates: Campocraspedon
- Fishes: Zaniolepis frenata
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Expand: Junqueira cow, Atka mackerel
Nominate and vote: Science collaboration of the month, Article Improvement Drive, WikiProject Animals Collaboration

Tree of Life Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tree of Life, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of taxonomy and the phylogenetic tree of life on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tree of LifeWikipedia:WikiProject Tree of LifeTemplate:WikiProject Tree of Lifetaxonomic articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Question from confused botanist edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Can someone add some links to appropriate parts of the zoological code for the statement that an available name must "be published in a timely fashion by a reputable source"? That seems so completely different from the spirit of the botanical code, that it would be interesting to see what is involved. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 16:46, 20 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Proposed merge of Unavailable name into Available name edit

Latest comment: 3 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Should be the same article (one is opposite of the other), but separate wikidata items (like it already is). Artoria 2e5 🌉 16:10, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Also, the polarity of the merge should be as you have proposed it; there are many fewer unique links to Unavailable name than to Available name, so there will be less confusion and link editing needed that way. My inclination at this point is to agree with the merge proposal. Dyanega (talk) 17:10, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic