Talk:Autos sacramentales

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): GGRiehl. Peer reviewers: Jlingreen.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 17:43, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 15:04, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

cleaning up style and punctuation

Although the grammar in this page is technically correct, the style is a bit awkward, and the punctuation, especially the use of commas, is at times non-standard. It appears that it was written by someone whose native language is not English. Although I applaud the work done by the author, it would be nice if someone with good writing skills would polish it. 68.226.125.32 14:16, 22 February 2007 (UTC)Jack Quinn

---

There is another article on the same topic: Auto (art). Andres (talk) 15:43, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Updating Article

I am currently working on updating this Wikipedia page. I want to make this article more reader-friendly by streamlining the formatting of the article, rewriting some of what is already written, and adding new information. I will also add sources to all information. GGRiehl (talk) 00:14, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Peer review

Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?

Everything in the article is relevant to the topic.

Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?

The article in its current state is unbiased.

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? 

The viewpoints are factual.

Check the citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? 

The article could use sources to back up the facts.

Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? 

Sources have not yet been included in the article.

Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added? 

The remaining sections will provide the reader with an in-depth understanding of the topic.

Jre1991 (talk) 02:27, 13 November 2017 (UTC)