Talk:Autonomous mobility on demand
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Great Article! edit
This was a fascinating read. As a minor suggestion, in order to enrich the article, I would add a section of the economic impact of such technologies within the cargo transport industry. A good place to start would be the mention of the USA greenlighting the use of self-driving trucks from Einride[1] (a swedish transport company) to use US roads. --Fferrario98 (talk) 14:29, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
References
- ^ "Einride launches in the US - first to US market with the future of shipping". Einride. 3rd of november 2021. Retrieved 1 July 2022.
{{cite news}}: Check date values in:|date=(help)
Comments Abduselam Hamid edit
Thanks for the nice article.
I included some links to the common words which are already available in Wikipedia. I also improved some minor spelling errors Abduselam Hamid (talk) 13:25, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Control edit
Excellent articel. Might consider adding a block diagram in the "Control" section. LuminousN (talk) 13:26, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Review edit
Excellent work, nothing to say! Andrea Andre lleo (talk) 14:20, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Observations and suggestions for improvements edit
The following observations and suggestions for improvements were collected, following expert review of the article within the Science, Technology, Society and Wikipedia course at the Politecnico di Milano, in June 2022.
A mention to the fact that one of the greatest benefits of shared mobility is reducing land use in urban areas is missing.
Mentioning ShareNow[11] and Enjoy[12] as examples of enterprices that are delivering shared mobility all over the world seems a little bit Milan-centric.
In the section “Rebalancing” the problem is wrongly imputed to the stochasticity of the customer demand while it is instead related to structural periodic (daily or weekly) oscillations of the origin-destination demand. It is also said that “some stations are more popular than others” wrongly assuming that all sharing systems are station-based.
The section “Control” is tautologic.
In the figure “Waymo car prorotype” should be replaced by “Waymo car prototype”.
The section “Logistics” debates more about accessibility than logistics.
--BarettoDiArchitettura (talk) 08:38, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
- Probably you are a little bit Milan-centric. ShareNow is operating in many different cities among Europe, and until few years ago also in the US, while Enjoy exists in several Italian cities.
- By the way, all the things written on this page are accurately referenced, they are not my opinion.
- I do not understand what you mean by "The section “Control” is tautologic", I just reported the two aspects of a fleet of autonomous shared vehicles that need to be controlled in order for it to perform the task it was created for, and once again this is not my opinion, all the researchers on the topic agree (as can be seen from the references). Thank you for your suggestions. Fraapal (talk) 09:31, 15 September 2022 (UTC)