Talk:Austrophya mystica

Latest comment: 3 years ago by No such user in topic Requested move 22 June 2021

Requested move 22 June 2021

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved to Austrophya mystica per nom. No such user (talk) 14:32, 8 July 2021 (UTC)Reply


AustrophyaAustrophya mystica – no longer monotypic John Tann (talk) 13:23, 22 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 13:30, 22 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
On retrospect, this move was mostly unnecessary, since (AFAICT) we still need two articles, one about the species and the other about the genus. I therefore performed a quick WP:SPLIT, moving the appropriate material back into Austrophya, but the articles will need some attention by someone in the know (categories and history in particular). No such user (talk) 14:47, 8 July 2021 (UTC)Reply