Talk:Austrolittorina unifasciata

Gastropods Low‑importance

	Gastropods portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gastropods, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of gastropods on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GastropodsWikipedia:WikiProject GastropodsTemplate:WikiProject GastropodsGastropods articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taxonomy: For all marine species, Project Gastropods uses the taxonomy in the online database WoRMS. When starting a new article, do not use sources of taxonomic information that predate the 2017 revision for all gastropod groups ("Revised Classification, Nomenclator and Typification of Gastropod and Monoplacophoran Families" by Philippe Bouchet & Jean-Pierre Rocroi, Bernhard Hausdorf, Andrzej Kaim, Yasunori Kano, Alexander Nützel, Pavel Parkhaev, Michael Schrödl and Ellen E. Strong in Malacologia, 2017, 61(1–2): 1–526.) (can be dowloaded at Researchgate.net), substituting the previous classification of 2005 Taxonomy of the Gastropoda (Bouchet & Rocroi, 2005). If you need help with any aspect of an article, please leave a note at the Project talk page.

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Austrolittorina unifasciata. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081005231741/http://www.amonline.net.au:80/invertebrates/mal/gallery/nodilit2.htm to http://www.amonline.net.au/invertebrates/mal/gallery/nodilit2.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:51, 22 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Size

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

My experience of the east coast population is that they are much smaller than 10–25 mm, more like 5 mm. Quoy & Gaimard give the length as "5 lignes", about 11 mm. Also generally the spire is brown and eroded, whereas some sources and photos show it entire. There might be differences between specimens from exposed vs. sheltered locations? Also there is different usage of "banded periwinkle" vs. "blue periwinkle" or even "australwink". Wondering if we are conflating different things, or is it just variation across range and situation? Pelagic ( messages ) Z – (20:53 Sun 24, AEST) 10:53, 24 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

This might be relevant, if I could find a copy:

McMahon, R. F., 1992. Microgeographic variation in the shell morphometrics of Nodilittorina unifasciata from southwestern Australia in relation to wave exposure of shore. In: J. Grahame, P. J. Mill & D. Reid (eds), Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Littorinid Biology. The Malacological Society of London, London: 107–117. Pelagic ( messages ) Z – (23:30 Sun 24, AEST) 13:30, 24 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add topic