Talk:Australian Research Council

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Australian Research Council is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Science Policy Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Policy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science policy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science PolicyWikipedia:WikiProject Science PolicyTemplate:WikiProject Science PolicyScience Policy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Higher education

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles

Criticism edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I moved this paragraph here

Many Australian researchers and academics are critical of the ARC for what they perceive as its overly bureaucratic processes. Other critics, primarily those in the humanities, are critical of the ARC's emphasis on scientific projects, although the downgrading of humanities research funding appears to be a worldwide trend. There is broad support for the organisation on the basis that it has improved the public profile and accountability of research in Australia.

because it is completely unsourced. I went looking for a few news articles criticizing the ARC to back it up but I found pretty much nothing. If it is indeed the case that "Many Australian researchers" are critical of the ARC's processes it should be easy to find a source for that no?Amaher (talk) 03:13, 5 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Reliance on primary sources edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Large sections of this article appear to be copy-pasted from the ARC website. It would be good to summarize (and perhaps shorten) to focus on the most important information, and to source more of the information from secondary sources.Mjsupina (talk) 09:23, 4 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add topic